Dr John M

cardiac electrophysiologist, cyclist, learner

  • Home
  • About
    • About Me
    • About the Blog
      • General Cardiology and Internal Medicine
    • Six Reasons why I Blog
    • What’s Electrophysiology?
    • ICD/Pacemaker
    • Electrophysiology Column / Medscape
    • Contact
  • Afib
    • AFib
    • AF in Athletes
    • The best tool to treat AF
    • Know your CHADS-VASC Score
    • 3 non-warfarin anticoagulants
    • AF ablation
      • 13 things to know about AF
      • Atrial Fib Ablation -2012 Update
      • Gender-Spec results of AF ablation
    • Female gender and stroke risk in AF
    • My AF Story
  • Heart Healthy
    • Heart Disease (by DrJohnM)
    • Healthy Living
    • Exercise
    • Nutrition
    • inflammation
  • Policy
    • Policy
    • Health Care
    • Health Care Reform
  • Doctoring
    • Doctoring
    • Knowledge
    • Reflection
    • General Medicine
      • Does your cholesterol level matter?
    • General Cardiolgy – Medicine
      • What is a normal heart rate?
      • Cardiology/Internal Med
      • General Cardiology
      • Athletic heart
        • The ECG of an athlete
      • General Medicine
      • Stroke
      • Statins
  • Cycling
    • DrJohnM on Cycling
    • How I became a bike racer
    • My top 12 Likes on Cycling
    • Cyclocross
      • A CX-Primer
    • Fitness
    • Athletic heart
    • The Mysterious Athletic Heart

Kentucky’s back problems

December 21, 2010 By Dr John

“John…Why are you going out in the cold?”

“I need some stuff for work.”

“Stuff?”

“Pens…those cool felt tip ones that write really dark and bold.”  I like it when the ‘Electrophysiology’ note stands out in the chart—like John Hancock’s signature did.

Until a few months ago, a pacemaker company used to give out nifty plastic pens.  They were awesome: brightly colored, lightweight (cyclists like everything to be lightweight), and they wrote smoothly. You couldn’t leave them laying around; they’d be snatched up in no time.

But these instruments of proclamation have gone the way of the narrative-only non-EMR patient letter. Vanished.  You see, plastic pens with industry-logos represent far too much temptation, far too much potential conflict of interest for doctors. They had to go, the all-knowing pen-banners proclaimed.

However, I, like most masters of the obvious, know that the notion that a 99 cent plastic pen could influence a doctor’s decision is a bit like a pre-teen believing in Santa.  They want to believe, but can’t because of reality.

The subliminal message of a plastic pen with an industry logo just doesn’t rate high enough on the influence scale to change a doctor’s behavior. It’s true and obvious; don’t over think it.

And for proof of their wrongness of scale, the pen-banners need only read yesterday’s front page WSJ article in which the excesses of the now (in)famous Norton Hospital (Louisville, KY) spine surgeons are chronicled in gory detail.  Granted, Kentucky has its problems with obesity and sedentarism, but who knew that there was this much spinal disease in our medium-sized midwestern city.  So much so that a 640-bed hospital would rank third in America in spinal fusion surgery.

Sure the 1000 dollar screws are eye-grabbing, but clearly the most striking feature of the article was the hard-to-fathom size of the royalties paid by Medtronic. For their “intellectual contributions” to product development, each of the five Louisville spine surgeons were paid 1.38 million in 2010.  (And this was only for the first three quarters of 2010.)

That’s a lot of pens! And just a little conflict.

As a doctor, it’s incredibly sad for me to read about such tomfoolery.  For most readers, it would be easy to conclude that such excess are a representative sample of doctors as a whole.  Although compelling, this conclusion would be dead wrong.  Rather, this story is similar to the saga of the one unruly kid who caused the whole class to loose recess. But in this case it would be that that one bad-boy made the whole school miss recess.

Ok, Ok… John….That’s a lot of words to say that a few doctors and hospitals reaping huge rewards from medical device surgery are not representative of doctors as a whole.

Is their anything else?  Any other lesson, message, conclusion?

Here’s my summary…

  • Doctors are humans and when humans are involved, so is human-nature.  This means greed is always in play.  That ain’t ever changing.
  • Doctors are not vigorous in their self-policing.  (Perhaps this is because of human nature too.)
  • Medical device companies benefit from 1000$ screws.
  • Hospitals benefit from the large volume of cases.  

From 2004 to 2008, Medicare paid Norton Hospital $48 million for the 2,475 spinal fusions it performed on Medicare patients during those five years, according to the Journal analysis.

  • Finally, the biggest reason that these rare but well-publicized cases occur is that in our present compensation system, doctors are paid according to ‘how much’ they do, rather than ‘how well’ they do it. 

The problem for masters of the obvious, is that we see the farcical regulations, like pen-banning, as distractions to the greater problems at hand, like a distorted compensation system that rewards quantity of care not quality of care. 

JMM

Oh, and one more thing, I never felt very conflicted about eating a pharma-bought bagel or sandwich, and I sure don’t now.

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • More
  • Reddit

Related posts:

  1. Is my Doctor worth extra money…my money?
  2. Waiting longer for health-care is a reality…
  3. I don’t think so…
  4. On quality of care as a strategy for success…

Filed Under: Doctoring, Health Care, Health Care Reform

John Mandrola, MD

Welcome, Enjoy, Interact. john-mandrola I am a cardiac electrophysiologist practicing in Louisville KY. I am also a husband to a palliative care doctor, a father, a bike racer, and a regular columnist at theHeart.org | Medscape

My First Book is Now Available…

Email Newsletter

Search the Site

Categories

Find me on theheart.org | Medscape Cardiology

  • Electrophysiology commentary on Medscape/Cardiology

Mandrola on Medscape

  • My Medscape column on general medical matters

For patients...Educational posts

  • 13 things to know about Atrial Fibrillation — 2014
  • A new cure of AF
  • Adding a new verb to doctoring: To deprescribe is to do a lot
  • AF ablation — 2015 A Cautionary Note
  • AF Ablation in 2012–An easier journey?
  • Atrial Flutter — 15 facts you may want to know.
  • Benign PVCs: A heart rhythm doctor’s approach.
  • Caution with early Cardioversion
  • Decisions of 2 low-risk cases of PAF
  • Defining success in AF ablation in 2014
  • Four commonly asked questions on AF ablation
  • Inflammation and AF — Get off the gas
  • Ten things to expect after AF ablation
  • The medical decsion as a gamble
  • The most important verb in our health crisis
  • Wellness Requires Ownership

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.