Dr John M

cardiac electrophysiologist, cyclist, learner

  • Home
  • About
    • About Me
    • About the Blog
      • General Cardiology and Internal Medicine
    • Six Reasons why I Blog
    • What’s Electrophysiology?
    • ICD/Pacemaker
    • Electrophysiology Column / Medscape
    • Contact
  • Afib
    • AFib
    • AF in Athletes
    • The best tool to treat AF
    • Know your CHADS-VASC Score
    • 3 non-warfarin anticoagulants
    • AF ablation
      • 13 things to know about AF
      • Atrial Fib Ablation -2012 Update
      • Gender-Spec results of AF ablation
    • Female gender and stroke risk in AF
    • My AF Story
  • Heart Healthy
    • Heart Disease (by DrJohnM)
    • Healthy Living
    • Exercise
    • Nutrition
    • inflammation
  • Policy
    • Policy
    • Health Care
    • Health Care Reform
  • Doctoring
    • Doctoring
    • Knowledge
    • Reflection
    • General Medicine
      • Does your cholesterol level matter?
    • General Cardiolgy – Medicine
      • What is a normal heart rate?
      • Cardiology/Internal Med
      • General Cardiology
      • Athletic heart
        • The ECG of an athlete
      • General Medicine
      • Stroke
      • Statins
  • Cycling
    • DrJohnM on Cycling
    • How I became a bike racer
    • My top 12 Likes on Cycling
    • Cyclocross
      • A CX-Primer
    • Fitness
    • Athletic heart
    • The Mysterious Athletic Heart

Waiting longer for health-care is a reality…

May 20, 2010 By Dr John

Doctoring in the trenches, using our knowledge and techno-gadgetry to enhance or save lives, is uplifting. Reading news on heath care reform is “not so much.”

Reform has yet to begin, but businesses and doctors are already changing their behavior. As chronicled in this depressing piece, it is clear that doctors are joining consolidated practices and choosing to be salaried more often.

“Last month, a hospital I’m affiliated with outside of Manhattan sent a note to its physicians announcing a new subsidiary it’s forming to buy up local medical practices. Nearby physicians are lining up to sell—and not just primary-care doctors, but highly paid specialists like orthopedic surgeons and neurologists. Similar developments are unfolding nationwide.”

Common sense would argue that a salaried doctor without any productivity incentive will see fewer patients.  It is human nature.  No, most doctors will not just clock out when someone is really sick, but the pressure to add elective patients on a busy procedure schedule, or full office day diminishes greatly when there is no skin in the game.

And, the demand/supply equation is growing increasingly askew.  Demand for healthcare is on the rise. Thanks to our skill and technology, patients live longer. With increased longevity comes more chronic diseases. As medical technology advances forward, so does the accepted standard of care.

As demand rises, the supply of care is decreasing.  Due to falling reimbursement, more doctors are opting out of medicare. Salaried doctors will see fewer patients.  More middle-aged doctors are either retiring early or choosing non-clinical careers.  Talented young people are choosing medicine as a career less often–but even when they do choose to doctor, they are less likely to choose primary care.  Ask veterans how easy it is to see a specialist?

The loser in the above equation is the consumer of health-care–you and me.

Think this isn’t real, just a blogger droning on.

Consider Mr M:

Call Mr M (your patient), “he had a small stroke and wants to know whether he should take warfarin to prevent another one,” comes the text message.

So I call, and Mr M, an 85 year old who is incredibly functional tells me his story.


“Which hospital were you at,” I ask.

“I didn’t go the hospital, it was the weekend, I didn’t want to bother the doctors, and it was only numbness on my left side… “I am a lttle better now,” he adds with an optimistic tone.

His MRI, ordered by his primary care doctor showed an isolated small stroke. The decision comes down to the choice of two disparate blood thinners. After explaining the dilemma, I add, “we really need you to see a neurologist.” 

“That’s what my primary care doctor said as well, but I called two neurologists, and the soonest they would see me was two months.”

Both neurologists he called are employed by a hospital. Is this just a coincidence?

I’m engaged now, so Mr M’s decision will get made something like this:  in between ablations tomorrow, I will mosey down to the radiology cocoon and find one of the incredibly talented neuro-radiologists my hospital is fortunate to have, and go over the MRI.  Then, I will call the neurologist and tell him the story and MRI findings.  With these two opinions, I will make a decision on blood thinner and call the patient with the answer. He will no longer need the neurologist opinion.

It will be fun finding out the answer.  It will help the patient. I will be reimbursed zero for an hour or so of my time. This fact is ok with me, in my present state, but not so with many doctors, and is it really fair?

This scenario is the tip of the iceberg.

JMM

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • More
  • Reddit

Related posts:

  1. Even with cutting doctor’s compensation, health-care costs will increase…
  2. Measuring quality of medical care. How can a consumer know?
  3. On quality of care as a strategy for success…
  4. Health care reforn: So much anger and it hasn’t even happened yet…

Filed Under: Doctoring, Health Care, Health Care Reform Tagged With: ObamaCare

John Mandrola, MD

Welcome, Enjoy, Interact. john-mandrola I am a cardiac electrophysiologist practicing in Louisville KY. I am also a husband to a palliative care doctor, a father, a bike racer, and a regular columnist at theHeart.org | Medscape

My First Book is Now Available…

Email Newsletter

Search the Site

Categories

Find me on theheart.org | Medscape Cardiology

  • Electrophysiology commentary on Medscape/Cardiology

Mandrola on Medscape

  • My Medscape column on general medical matters

For patients...Educational posts

  • 13 things to know about Atrial Fibrillation — 2014
  • A new cure of AF
  • Adding a new verb to doctoring: To deprescribe is to do a lot
  • AF ablation — 2015 A Cautionary Note
  • AF Ablation in 2012–An easier journey?
  • Atrial Flutter — 15 facts you may want to know.
  • Benign PVCs: A heart rhythm doctor’s approach.
  • Caution with early Cardioversion
  • Decisions of 2 low-risk cases of PAF
  • Defining success in AF ablation in 2014
  • Four commonly asked questions on AF ablation
  • Inflammation and AF — Get off the gas
  • Ten things to expect after AF ablation
  • The medical decsion as a gamble
  • The most important verb in our health crisis
  • Wellness Requires Ownership

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.