Dr John M

cardiac electrophysiologist, cyclist, learner

  • Home
  • About
    • About Me
    • About the Blog
      • General Cardiology and Internal Medicine
    • Six Reasons why I Blog
    • What’s Electrophysiology?
    • ICD/Pacemaker
    • Electrophysiology Column / Medscape
    • Contact
  • Afib
    • AFib
    • AF in Athletes
    • The best tool to treat AF
    • Know your CHADS-VASC Score
    • 3 non-warfarin anticoagulants
    • AF ablation
      • 13 things to know about AF
      • Atrial Fib Ablation -2012 Update
      • Gender-Spec results of AF ablation
    • Female gender and stroke risk in AF
    • My AF Story
  • Heart Healthy
    • Heart Disease (by DrJohnM)
    • Healthy Living
    • Exercise
    • Nutrition
    • inflammation
  • Policy
    • Policy
    • Health Care
    • Health Care Reform
  • Doctoring
    • Doctoring
    • Knowledge
    • Reflection
    • General Medicine
      • Does your cholesterol level matter?
    • General Cardiolgy – Medicine
      • What is a normal heart rate?
      • Cardiology/Internal Med
      • General Cardiology
      • Athletic heart
        • The ECG of an athlete
      • General Medicine
      • Stroke
      • Statins
  • Cycling
    • DrJohnM on Cycling
    • How I became a bike racer
    • My top 12 Likes on Cycling
    • Cyclocross
      • A CX-Primer
    • Fitness
    • Athletic heart
    • The Mysterious Athletic Heart

An antidote for inflammation

January 10, 2013 By Dr John

Being mid-week, I had planned to tell you about the recent news concerning the role of fitness as a predictor of real outcomes. Important as this is, it will have to wait.

I’ve got something much better. Though it isn’t about exercise; it is about health and happiness and soothing inflammation.

Writing this year’s best opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal, the president of Notre Dame, Father John Jenkins, makes the case for persuasion as the cure for incivility.

He is talking to the political parties, addressing the toxic rancor on display in recent times, but it strikes me as applicable to more than just politics. May I dare think about healthcare reform or patient care?

His argument is captured in this passage:

If I am trying to persuade others, I first have to understand their position, which means I have to listen to them. I have to appeal to their values, which means I have to show them respect. I have to find the best arguments for my position, which means I have to think about my values in the context of their concerns. I have to answer their objections, which means I have to work honestly with their ideas. I have to ask them to listen to me, which means I can’t insult them.

This is refreshing, isn’t it?

Those of us ensnared in the debate on healthcare delivery could learn a lot from this message. Think about it. At the core, I suspect doctors, industry and policy-makers all want the same thing: a more efficient system that provides better care for fellow mankind.

I’ve said this before: doctors’ self-esteem hangs on how much good they do for patients. It’s the same with medical industry: they aim to build better products. Industry is not the enemy; without innovation, we would be practicing medicine without any tools. Imagine treating a heart attack without a stent or a cath lab. And even policy makers and regulators aren’t villains. They also hope to engineer a more cost-effective and inclusive delivery system for all the citizens.

More and more, it seems the parties involved have grown uncivil.

In patient care, almost all doctors have faced this difficult scenario:

You are about to go see a sick patient. The nurse tells you beforehand that the family and patient are upset. You might even have been told they are angry mean people. You look down the hallway of the ward and see the stern faces of family members in angst. In almost every case, the way out of this trouble is the same:

You go in to the room and display warmth. You ask what the patient and family see as the medical issue—not what others say it is. Then you listen. Invariably, the picture becomes clear. You understand their position. And for the win: you try to persuade them in the context of their concerns. This works almost all the time, whether there is a cure or not.

It is easier than you think.

JMM

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • More
  • Reddit

Related posts:

  1. An antidote…
  2. The parallax of healthcare reform: A real-life story
  3. More inflammation will not solve the doctor shortage
  4. Friday Reflection: A doctor’s antidote

Filed Under: Doctoring, Health Care Reform, Reflection

John Mandrola, MD

Welcome, Enjoy, Interact. john-mandrola I am a cardiac electrophysiologist practicing in Louisville KY. I am also a husband to a palliative care doctor, a father, a bike racer, and a regular columnist at theHeart.org | Medscape

My First Book is Now Available…

Email Newsletter

Search the Site

Categories

Find me on theheart.org | Medscape Cardiology

  • Electrophysiology commentary on Medscape/Cardiology

Mandrola on Medscape

  • My Medscape column on general medical matters

For patients...Educational posts

  • 13 things to know about Atrial Fibrillation — 2014
  • A new cure of AF
  • Adding a new verb to doctoring: To deprescribe is to do a lot
  • AF ablation — 2015 A Cautionary Note
  • AF Ablation in 2012–An easier journey?
  • Atrial Flutter — 15 facts you may want to know.
  • Benign PVCs: A heart rhythm doctor’s approach.
  • Caution with early Cardioversion
  • Decisions of 2 low-risk cases of PAF
  • Defining success in AF ablation in 2014
  • Four commonly asked questions on AF ablation
  • Inflammation and AF — Get off the gas
  • Ten things to expect after AF ablation
  • The medical decsion as a gamble
  • The most important verb in our health crisis
  • Wellness Requires Ownership

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.