Dr John M

cardiac electrophysiologist, cyclist, learner

  • Home
  • About
    • About Me
    • About the Blog
      • General Cardiology and Internal Medicine
    • Six Reasons why I Blog
    • What’s Electrophysiology?
    • ICD/Pacemaker
    • Electrophysiology Column / Medscape
    • Contact
  • Afib
    • AFib
    • AF in Athletes
    • The best tool to treat AF
    • Know your CHADS-VASC Score
    • 3 non-warfarin anticoagulants
    • AF ablation
      • 13 things to know about AF
      • Atrial Fib Ablation -2012 Update
      • Gender-Spec results of AF ablation
    • Female gender and stroke risk in AF
    • My AF Story
  • Heart Healthy
    • Heart Disease (by DrJohnM)
    • Healthy Living
    • Exercise
    • Nutrition
    • inflammation
  • Policy
    • Policy
    • Health Care
    • Health Care Reform
  • Doctoring
    • Doctoring
    • Knowledge
    • Reflection
    • General Medicine
      • Does your cholesterol level matter?
    • General Cardiolgy – Medicine
      • What is a normal heart rate?
      • Cardiology/Internal Med
      • General Cardiology
      • Athletic heart
        • The ECG of an athlete
      • General Medicine
      • Stroke
      • Statins
  • Cycling
    • DrJohnM on Cycling
    • How I became a bike racer
    • My top 12 Likes on Cycling
    • Cyclocross
      • A CX-Primer
    • Fitness
    • Athletic heart
    • The Mysterious Athletic Heart

A rough day in heart-rhythm news

January 20, 2011 By Dr John

For some patients it’s a terrible sensation; they are left scared and persistently anxious.

For others it’s just a thump in the chest.

But for nearly all patients shocked by their ICD (internal cardiac defibrillator), it means they are still alive.

Today was a sad day for electrophysiology–a branch of cardiology that has the prevention of sudden death as one of its primary missions.   I am a newbie, a mere debutante, an apprentice master of the obvious, and even I know it isn’t good to share the news with the US Department of Justice.

There were two headlines.  The first story is one well known to all ICD-implanting hospitals.

This ‘important message’ came today in my inbox:

The Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) is aware of an ongoing U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) civil investigation of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) implants and has agreed to assist in an advisory role to lend expertise concerning proper guidelines for clinical decision making. As an advisor to this investigation, HRS is reviewing information that does not include either identifiable patient or facility level data. Rather, we are providing insight on the field of electrophysiology to the DOJ. Because this is an ongoing investigation, HRS Staff or Leadership is not available for further comment. HRS will communicate additional information to its membership when permitted to do so by the DOJ.

The second EP-news item of the day was that ICD-maker, St Jude Medical, agreed to pay $16 million in fines to settle claims that they paid kickbacks to implanting cardiologists.

Specifically, the suit alleged that St Jude used post-market studies (with their accompanying per-patient stipends) as a guise to financially lure doctors to implant their devices.

The DOJ said:

It is critical that physicians base their decisions on which medical device to implant on the best interest of the patient, not on whether a device manufacturer will pay an extra fee or honoraria for the implant.

Ouch.

A bad day indeed.

What’s behind this curtain of ‘news’ is the notion that ICD decision-making is really complicated. Evaluating and treating real-life patients at risk of sudden death is much different than interpreting t-tests.

I have been a strong advocate of applying clinical judgment in the decision to recommend an ICD—a tenet that is overtly expressed in the guidelines.  But now, based on the palpable fear in my community, and the tone of the HRS statement, I am worried that this heavy swinging pendulum will cost lives.

Remember, ICDs are therapy for sudden death, not back pain.

JMM

Ed Note: Those who wish to thoroughly (and I mean thoroughly) understand the complexity of calling an ICD ‘non-evidenced based’ should read Dr Rich’s post on The Abuse of ICD Guidelines.

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • More
  • Reddit

Related posts:

  1. Heart rhythm doctors on the limit…
  2. Concierge medicine makes everyday a snow day. Implications for impending health care reform…
  3. Fixing the heart rhythm is but just one chapter…
  4. Be positive… It is good for the heart.

Filed Under: Health Care Reform, ICD/Pacemaker

John Mandrola, MD

Welcome, Enjoy, Interact. john-mandrola I am a cardiac electrophysiologist practicing in Louisville KY. I am also a husband to a palliative care doctor, a father, a bike racer, and a regular columnist at theHeart.org | Medscape

My First Book is Now Available…

Email Newsletter

Search the Site

Categories

Find me on theheart.org | Medscape Cardiology

  • Electrophysiology commentary on Medscape/Cardiology

Mandrola on Medscape

  • My Medscape column on general medical matters

For patients...Educational posts

  • 13 things to know about Atrial Fibrillation — 2014
  • A new cure of AF
  • Adding a new verb to doctoring: To deprescribe is to do a lot
  • AF ablation — 2015 A Cautionary Note
  • AF Ablation in 2012–An easier journey?
  • Atrial Flutter — 15 facts you may want to know.
  • Benign PVCs: A heart rhythm doctor’s approach.
  • Caution with early Cardioversion
  • Decisions of 2 low-risk cases of PAF
  • Defining success in AF ablation in 2014
  • Four commonly asked questions on AF ablation
  • Inflammation and AF — Get off the gas
  • Ten things to expect after AF ablation
  • The medical decsion as a gamble
  • The most important verb in our health crisis
  • Wellness Requires Ownership

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.