Dr John M

cardiac electrophysiologist, cyclist, learner

  • Home
  • About
    • About Me
    • About the Blog
      • General Cardiology and Internal Medicine
    • Six Reasons why I Blog
    • What’s Electrophysiology?
    • ICD/Pacemaker
    • Electrophysiology Column / Medscape
    • Contact
  • Afib
    • AFib
    • AF in Athletes
    • The best tool to treat AF
    • Know your CHADS-VASC Score
    • 3 non-warfarin anticoagulants
    • AF ablation
      • 13 things to know about AF
      • Atrial Fib Ablation -2012 Update
      • Gender-Spec results of AF ablation
    • Female gender and stroke risk in AF
    • My AF Story
  • Heart Healthy
    • Heart Disease (by DrJohnM)
    • Healthy Living
    • Exercise
    • Nutrition
    • inflammation
  • Policy
    • Policy
    • Health Care
    • Health Care Reform
  • Doctoring
    • Doctoring
    • Knowledge
    • Reflection
    • General Medicine
      • Does your cholesterol level matter?
    • General Cardiolgy – Medicine
      • What is a normal heart rate?
      • Cardiology/Internal Med
      • General Cardiology
      • Athletic heart
        • The ECG of an athlete
      • General Medicine
      • Stroke
      • Statins
  • Cycling
    • DrJohnM on Cycling
    • How I became a bike racer
    • My top 12 Likes on Cycling
    • Cyclocross
      • A CX-Primer
    • Fitness
    • Athletic heart
    • The Mysterious Athletic Heart

Gender differences in the treatment of Atrial Fib

March 7, 2011 By Dr John

I was recently asked a seemingly simple question about differences in how women with atrial fibrillation (AF) are treated.

The questioner was referring to this large AF-ablation study published a year ago in the Heart Rhythm Journal. Researchers at St David’s Hospital in Austin, TX reported striking differences in the outcomes and complications of more than 3200 women that underwent AF-Ablation at 5 different centers.

Here’s a highlight of the differences outlined in this study:

  • Women underwent AF ablation 5 times less often than men.
  • AF ablation was less successful in women.
  • Women were older than men at the time of AF ablation.
  • Women had failed more drugs than men before referral for ablation.
  • Women had later stage AF at the time they were referred for ablation.
  • Women were more likely to have atypical firing-sites (outside the pulmonary veins) for AF.
  • Women had more bleeding complications after ablation.

These data are consistent with other well known facts about heart disease in women.

  • Women with AF are at greater risk for stroke than men. In fact, the association is so strong, European investigators give female gender a full point in their more detailed CHADS2-VASc score for predicting stroke in AF. (A concise summary on CHADS2-VASc is here, on TheHeart.org.)
  • Women are more susceptible to AF-drugs, especially those that increase the time it takes the heart to relax (QT-prolonging drugs). In other words, the electrical properties of the heart cell often vary by gender.
  • The most common form of SVT (Supraventricular Tachycardia), AV Nodal Reentry (AVNRT) occurs more often in women.
  • Women are under-referred for other innovative cardiac technologies, like defibrillators, bypass surgery and cardiac catheterization.

So what was that simple question?

What’s the explanation for these striking treatment differences in women with AF?

The researchers from Austin offer only speculation. They suggested that women may present later in the course of their disease because they are more stoic about their symptoms. Or, women may have fewer AF-ablations because they are less likely to agree to invasive therapy. They even cited child-care responsibilities as a possibility.

Famous author and WSJ columnist, Peggy Noonan, writing with Melanie True Hills, editor of the well known AF-website, StopAF.org weigh in with another possible explanation:

“I think today it’s more often an issue of differing communication styles between doctors and women patients…

Doctors are trained to listen for facts, but as women we may be “genetically programmed” to communicate with more emotion and feelings that give context and richness to our messages. That can create miscommunication as doctors may not hear or understand all of what we’re saying. I often hear a common refrain of “my doctor didn’t listen to me.” It may actually be a case of the doctor hearing the words, but not the whole message.”

I can’t say that I have any better explanations. I don’t think anyone knows for sure.

But I can say that I haven’t noticed similar patterns in my AF practice. (Neither did two other private practice AF-ablation colleagues that I asked before writing this post.) That doesn’t mean I don’t believe their data. I do. It appears to be clean, unbiased reporting of what they found.

In our real-world AF practice, however, it hasn’t been obvious that women are under-represented as ablation candidates. I also have not noticed that our ablation success rates are lower, or complication rates higher in women. And, I hear women with AF describe equal degrees of breathlessness, fatigue and quivering as men.

The caveat here, of course, is that real-world AF doctors do not have at their disposal an army of foundation-supported research associates. We have our reading of the literature, and our experiences with patients that we have ablated (or not ablated.)

As the treasure of ablating AF–relief of symptoms without medicine–gets spread to more patients, real world data from national registries, like SAFARI, will add greatly to our knowledge base. Since the 1990s, heart rhythm doctors often use the expression, learning while burning. Yes, in AF, catheter ablation continues to teach us about this amazingly complex disease. The learning is at a fever pitch at the moment.

For now, I would offer this practical advice to women with AF:

  • Talk to your doctor clearly about your symptoms. Your AF doctor needs to know the degree to which AF symptoms disrupt your quality of life. Symptoms are one of the major factors that determine whether AF ablation is recommended.
  • Women should know that AF ablation works best when done early in the natural history of the disease. They should urge to be referred to an AF doctor earlier in the course of AF: when AF is still occurring intermittently, rather than permanently, for example.
  • Women might remind their AF-doctor to look carefully for sites of triggering outside the PV areas. In other words, if AF is triggered from Kansas, an electric fence around the coast lines won’t do any good. (We do this as a matter of routine in all patients.)
  • Women should seek out an enlightened, experienced AF-doctor who listens to you, and isn’t upset if you bring this kind of ‘e-info’ to the visit.

As a learner, I am interested in the opinions of others. Please feel free to offer them in the comments section.

JMM

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • More
  • Reddit

Related posts:

  1. A real world view of new developments in the treatment of atrial fibrillation…
  2. In atrial fibrillation therapy, not all the hype is true…
  3. Atrial fibrillation ablation in women…Are there any real differences?
  4. Atrial fibrillation ablation in the news. Some good science…

Filed Under: AF ablation, Doctoring Tagged With: Women's Heart disease

John Mandrola, MD

Welcome, Enjoy, Interact. john-mandrola I am a cardiac electrophysiologist practicing in Louisville KY. I am also a husband to a palliative care doctor, a father, a bike racer, and a regular columnist at theHeart.org | Medscape

My First Book is Now Available…

Email Newsletter

Search the Site

Categories

Find me on theheart.org | Medscape Cardiology

  • Electrophysiology commentary on Medscape/Cardiology

Mandrola on Medscape

  • My Medscape column on general medical matters

For patients...Educational posts

  • 13 things to know about Atrial Fibrillation — 2014
  • A new cure of AF
  • Adding a new verb to doctoring: To deprescribe is to do a lot
  • AF ablation — 2015 A Cautionary Note
  • AF Ablation in 2012–An easier journey?
  • Atrial Flutter — 15 facts you may want to know.
  • Benign PVCs: A heart rhythm doctor’s approach.
  • Caution with early Cardioversion
  • Decisions of 2 low-risk cases of PAF
  • Defining success in AF ablation in 2014
  • Four commonly asked questions on AF ablation
  • Inflammation and AF — Get off the gas
  • Ten things to expect after AF ablation
  • The medical decsion as a gamble
  • The most important verb in our health crisis
  • Wellness Requires Ownership

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.